A Murder in West Cork is separated out into three episodes on Netflix. The first episode deals with the murder itself, the details and the history of the victim. The second episode deals with the interrogation and the history of the suspect and episode three deals with the results and the conclusion of the investigation.
In this documentary series, the first episode is very hard to get into. I had to sit down on two different occasions to get through episode one and it wasn’t grabbing my attention. I feel like the first episode was trying to cover too much and it wasn’t solely focused on one thing. Once you come to the end of episode one, it really starts to grab your attention.
Episode one has pacing issues that won’t keep you fully invested, advice I got from a friend that recommended the show was just to power through because it gets better. The series isn’t boring, it’s just not well paced and not well put together but episode 2 and 3 really heats up. The documentary does have a few twists and there’s a lot of information thrown at you from all different angles. With that said there are a few main talking points I want to cover.
The murder victim in this case was Sophie Toscan Du Plantier. The documentary betrayed Sophie as a kind gentle woman who enjoyed peace and quiet. Maybe that’s why she gravitated toward the town of Schull, she had a vacation home that she used for getaways and holidays. Many residents interviewed describe Schull as a very welcoming town to non-locals or blowins as they were seen as back then. A kind of safe haven for people considered outsiders by the rest of society.
Sophie’s murder took place in 1996 and quickly became international news. The Gardai began investigating her murder as the whole town of Scull tried to comprehend the reality of what had happened. Investigators quickly turned their attention to Ian Bailey. Bailey was a former British journalist who was also residing in Schull and was now the main suspect. A witness claimed she spotted him acting hysterical on the night of the murder at Kealfadda bridge which is near Sophie’s house. Bailey protested his innocence to Gardai under investigation however in the following months more substantial evidence came forward.
Fellow residents claimed this evidence came in the form of strange erratic behavior along with extreme emotional distress when discussing Sophie and her murder. In addition, on two occasions Bailey gave two unprovoked confessions. This would all become crucial evidence to investigators as all physical evidence was unusable due to incompetence from the local Gardai. The lack of physical evidence in this case made Bailey’s confessions and erratic behavior all the more important to investigators’ efforts. Bailey, when confronted about his erratic behavior, denies he ever acted in such a way and when confronted about his confessions he tries to write it off as having a dark sense of humor.
Ian Bailey goes on to sue over the fact that he was implicated in this murder and his name has been forever tarnished and will always be associated with the murder of Sophie. Similar to other murder cases, the victim often gets lost in the chaos and the main spotlight is then shot upon the suspect. The problem is cases are often messy and go on for years, things get drawn out and suspects find a way to wriggle out of things and make it more about another thing rather than the murder.
This happened in this case, Ian Bailey sued over the tarnishing of his name, this in turn threw up a roadblock in the investigation and took people’s focus away from the murder. I just found it sad for her family who just wanted some justice and they weren’t going to get it.
Overall I thought it was very biased towards Ian Bailey as a murderer and I realized he was the prime suspect in the murder case but they really used all their resources to make him as unlikable on camera as possible. In my opinion, he came across as unlikable and arrogant which didn’t go down well with the Gardai. Our perception of events are always going to be affected by the tone of the storyteller and in a Murder in West Cork there was an element of bias. There are parts where he came across as intelligent and passionate about poetry and other parts where he came across as arrogant and full of himself.
A Murder in West Cork shines a light on many things, it shines light on the justice Sophie’s family are still seeking as well as the effect her murder had on the town of Schull. It also shines the light on the incompetence of the Gardai but more than anything else it shines a light on the character of Ian Bailey. Whether or not the persona he betrays is his true persona, this is the character that viewers will see and have to judge him.
Overall I enjoyed watching a Murder in West Cork, it was an interesting watch and if you have an interest in true crime I would highly recommend it. The documentary also includes the fallout of the investigation and what happens after Ian Bailey is investigated as a suspect.
I agree in the main. I think more focus should have been on Sophie her Son and elderly parents. A bit too much PR for Ian Bailey insufficient focus on the shambles of an investigation by Irish Gardai not to mention The Dead man’s Dr as the then state pathologist self reference. The Irish State show bow their head in shame for so many things and for finally not ensuring the lying conniving woman Marie Farrell was not charged with Perjury, perverting the course of justice and wasting Police time Jim Sheridan forgot Sophie